Twice the Meta budget, and the return held.
A Singapore womenswear brand gave Meta audiences built from each shopper's predicted value. The budget doubled over 79 days, and return on ad spend stayed within 8%.
- Womenswear · Shopify · Singapore, SEA, US, Australia
- One Meta campaign, 79 days, mid-2026
- Revenue from Shopify orders, not ad reports
Meta could recognize less than a third of its own visitors.
Facebook brought half or more of the store's traffic. Only about 30% of those visitors carried an identifier the pixel could use, because most arrived in Facebook's in-app browser.
Of 3,000 abandoned browsers on a typical day, 101 could be retargeted. Reported purchases were counted 1.8 to 1.9 times. Audiences came from broad demographics and past behavior.
Meta learns who is worth finding
Audiences from future value
For every shopper, the agent predicts spend over the next 12 months. That seeds a lookalike of new people most likely to become high-value customers.
Complete purchase signal
Every session is captured server-side, including in-app browser traffic, and Meta gets clean events, each purchase counted once.
One campaign, three audiences
A value-based lookalike for new customers, visitors weighted by predicted value, and existing customers.
Same season, a year apart
The same 60 days, 23 May to 22 July, in 2025 and 2026. Revenue from Shopify orders. A year-on-year comparison, not a controlled test.
| Measure | 2025, before Releva | 2026, with Releva | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta spend, indexed | 100 | 89 | −11% |
| Store revenue per Meta dollar | 6.09 | 6.45 | +6% |
| Store revenue per click, indexed | 100 | 188 | +88% |
| Revenue per customer, indexed | 100 | 133 | +33% |
The spring-to-summer drop in efficiency was −24% in 2025 and −12% in 2026.
The future-value audience led on return
Over 72 days, with the same creative in the same countries, the value-based lookalike returned 5.67 on ad spend, against 5.28 for a broad demographic audience.
In a matched 30-day cohort, profiles the campaign reached became buyers at 0.56%, against 0.34% for the old campaign: 65% higher.
How we counted
Store data. Revenue figures are Shopify orders, not Meta's attribution.
Same season, not a controlled test. The yearly comparison uses the same 60 days, so the season matches. Other things changed too, so it is not a controlled result.
Get the method and setup notes
How each number on this page was counted, the definitions, and what was switched on in the store, in order. Enter your work email and the notes open; we also send you the link.
Thanks. Open the method and setup notes.
We use your email to know who reads our case studies, and to send the link. Privacy policy
Read next
Ads audiences
Tells Meta, Google and TikTok who is worth finding, from each shopper's predicted value.
See Ads audiences →SolutionGet more from your ad spend
Stop paying for customers you already own, and give the ads better signal.
See the solution →Case studyThe same brand, email and site
Nine times the revenue on the same abandoned-browse flow, and more repeat buyers.
Read the case study →
See how much of your Meta traffic your setup cannot see
Thirty minutes, with your ad account open. If the numbers are not there, we will say so.
Book 30 minutes





You'll talk to one of us.