Case studies / Womenswear on Meta
Case study · womenswear on Meta

Twice the Meta budget, and the return held.

A Singapore womenswear brand gave Meta audiences built from each shopper's predicted value. The budget doubled over 79 days, and return on ad spend stayed within 8%.

  • Womenswear · Shopify · Singapore, SEA, US, Australia
  • One Meta campaign, 79 days, mid-2026
  • Revenue from Shopify orders, not ad reports
Meta campaign · 79 daysads
Value-based lookalikenew customers
Visitors, weighted by predicted valuemid-funnel
Customersbottom
Daily budget
2.1×
ROAS within 8%
Buyer rate
+65%
profiles reached
2.1×daily budget over 79 days, return on ad spend held within 8%
+88%store revenue per click, same 60 days, 2025 against 2026
+65%buyer rate of profiles the campaign reached, matched 30-day cohort
+33%revenue per customer, same 60 days year on year
The problem

Meta could recognize less than a third of its own visitors.

Facebook brought half or more of the store's traffic. Only about 30% of those visitors carried an identifier the pixel could use, because most arrived in Facebook's in-app browser.

Of 3,000 abandoned browsers on a typical day, 101 could be retargeted. Reported purchases were counted 1.8 to 1.9 times. Audiences came from broad demographics and past behavior.

What the agent changed

Meta learns who is worth finding

1

Audiences from future value

For every shopper, the agent predicts spend over the next 12 months. That seeds a lookalike of new people most likely to become high-value customers.

2

Complete purchase signal

Every session is captured server-side, including in-app browser traffic, and Meta gets clean events, each purchase counted once.

3

One campaign, three audiences

A value-based lookalike for new customers, visitors weighted by predicted value, and existing customers.

Results

Same season, a year apart

The same 60 days, 23 May to 22 July, in 2025 and 2026. Revenue from Shopify orders. A year-on-year comparison, not a controlled test.

Measure2025, before Releva2026, with RelevaChange
Meta spend, indexed10089−11%
Store revenue per Meta dollar6.096.45+6%
Store revenue per click, indexed100188+88%
Revenue per customer, indexed100133+33%

The spring-to-summer drop in efficiency was −24% in 2025 and −12% in 2026.

Inside the campaign

The future-value audience led on return

Over 72 days, with the same creative in the same countries, the value-based lookalike returned 5.67 on ad spend, against 5.28 for a broad demographic audience.

In a matched 30-day cohort, profiles the campaign reached became buyers at 0.56%, against 0.34% for the old campaign: 65% higher.

Ad sets · 72 days · return on ad spendads
Value-based lookalike5.67
Customers and visitors5.46
Broad demographic5.28

How we counted

Store data. Revenue figures are Shopify orders, not Meta's attribution.

Same season, not a controlled test. The yearly comparison uses the same 60 days, so the season matches. Other things changed too, so it is not a controlled result.

Get the method and setup notes

How each number on this page was counted, the definitions, and what was switched on in the store, in order. Enter your work email and the notes open; we also send you the link.

Thanks. Open the method and setup notes.

We use your email to know who reads our case studies, and to send the link. Privacy policy

See how much of your Meta traffic your setup cannot see

Thirty minutes, with your ad account open. If the numbers are not there, we will say so.

Book 30 minutes
GeorgiYavorBoryanaBoyanMariaIsaacNikoletaYou'll talk to one of us.